How to Create the FASTEST Teams

This content is syndicated from Kelly Waters by Kelly Waters. To view the original post in full, click here.

Over the last 30 years at work, I have observed many re-structures.  Some I was part of.  Some I created.  Some worked.  Some didn’t.  And some created only marginal benefits.  Others – in more recent years – were truly transformational and catapulted team performance to a whole new level. I have always been fascinated by management and leadership and how to get the very best from a group of people.  I have read a lot of books on the subject.  I have studied a bit of psychology.  And I now have more than quarter of a Century of observation, experimentation and preoccupation with how to create high performance teams. As a result of all this learning, I have now formed strong views about what I think works the best.  About what I think creates the best teams.  Teams that create the best quality.  The most adaptable, innovative teams.  And the fastest teams. I have tried to distil that 30 years experience into a brief set of principles that I feel really strongly about, regardless of specific context.  I’ve come up with 7 principles to create the FASTEST teams.  Here they are:
  • Focused & Flexible
  • Autonomous
  • Small
  • Talented
  • Established
  • Stable
  • Together
Here’s a brief explanation of each one… Focused & Flexible.  By focused, I mean 100% dedicated to a single, common purpose, i.e. one team, one goal.  By flexible, I mean not too hung up on job titles and job descriptions and roles are not over-specialised.  I might specialise in X so I’d rather be doing that most of the time, but I am happy to do anything that helps my team to achieve its goal. Autonomous.  By autonomous, I mean that the team ideally has control of their own destiny, from idea to value, with minimum or no reliance on other teams.  The team is complete and truly empowered.  This is hard to achieve in a larger organisation, but it is worth striving for, as it may be the single biggest factor in creating high performance teams. Small.  Research suggests that the optimum team size for interdependent work is 5-12 people.  I would agree with this, but I would go for the smaller end whenever possible.  Minimising specialists helps to keep teams, and the overhead of each team, small. Talented.  Over the years, I have seen many managers speak about recruitment, retention and performance management as a chore.  But we are in the people business, so this is not a chore, it is one of the most fundamental aspects of creating a high performance team.  Give recruitment the energy it deserves and be very selective. Actively focus on how to retain your best talent.  And actively manage the weaknesses in your teams – either through more support and training, finding a more suitable role, or ultimately by managing them out.  Give your teams the opportunity to develop their skills and help them to master their chosen discipline. Established.  There is no team like an established team.  I believe there is immense value in creating persistent teams that are long-lasting.  In a project environment, this means feeding work or projects to established teams, rather than forming new teams around projects as they start up.  The key benefits of established teams are that they’ve already been through their storming phase and learnt how to work effectively together, they’ve optimised their processes, and they know their capacity. Stable.  It’s related to the point above, but once a team is established, try to keep it stable, instead of chopping and changing and the constant resource contention and delays that come from ever-changing team members or unpredictable availability.  Ramping up and ramping down are disruptive. Together.  This is the simplest principle of all, but often it’s not simple in an existing organisation where functional teams have sprung up in different locations.  Now reorganising the teams isn’t just about the structure of reporting lines and seating arrangements, it’s also about relocating people and that’s not easy.  There may be economic or other reasons for not co-locating people, but if at all possible, sit people close together. Apart from minimising distraction and coordination and therefore reducing delays and bottlenecks, the above principles also speak directly to Dan Pink’s intrinsic motivators: Autonomy, Mastery and Purpose.  These are the things that really inspire people from within, beyond money for food and shelter and other necessities like that. In all my experience, I have seen time and time again that these principles are extremely powerful.  I really believe that these are the main factors in creating high performance teams, at least in terms of structure.  Other than that, just add Inspirational Leadership to inspire and motivate the team and you’ll have something very special. Having said all of that, in a large organisation I recognise these points can be hard to achieve.  But then there are other cases where I’ve seen these things could be achieved and they aren’t. Whenever I’ve had control of the structure, I have focused a lot of my energy and determination on striving for these ideals and getting these things in place, however painful it was.  And it really paid off. Kelly.

Leave a Reply

What is 3 + 9 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
Please do this simple sum so I know you are human:)

There are 101 ways to approach anything.
To find the best way, sometimes you need expert help

What People Say

“Kelly revolutionised the way our digital department operated. A true advocate of agile principles, he quickly improved internal communication within our teams and our internal clients by aligning our business and creating a much enhanced sense of transparency in the decisions the business was making. Kelly also introduced a higher sense of empowerment to the development teams...”


“Kelly’s a leading program director with the ability to take charge from day one and keep strong momentum at both a program and project level driving prioritisation, resourcing and budgeting agendas. Kelly operates with an easy-going style and possesses a strong facilitation skill set. From my 5 months experience working with Kelly, I would recommend Kelly to program manage large scale, complex, cross company change programs both from a business and IT perspective.”


“Kelly is an extremely talented and visionary leader. As such he manages to inspire all around him to achieve their best. He is passionate about agile and has a wealth of experience to bring to bear in this area. If you're 'lucky' he might even tell you all about his agile blog. Above all this, Kelly is great fun to work with. He is always relaxed and never gets stressed - and trust me, he had plenty of opportunity here! If you get the chance to work with Kelly, don't pass it up.”


“Kelly is an Agile heavy-weight. He came in to assess my multi-million $ Agile development program which wasn’t delivering the right throughput. He interviewed most of the team and made some key recommendations that, when implemented, showed immediate results. I couldn’t ask for more than that except he’s a really nice guy as well.”


“Kelly and I worked together on a very large project trying to secure a new Insurer client. Kelly had fantastic commercial awareness as well as his technical expertise. Without him I would never had secured this client so I owe a lot to him. He is also a really great guy!”


“Kelly came to the department and has really made a huge impact on how the department communicates, collaborates and generally gets things done. We were already developing in an agile way, but Kelly has brought us even more into alignment with agile and scrum best practices, being eager to share information and willing to work with us to change our processes rather than dictate how things must be done. He is highly knowledgable about agile development (as his active blog proves) but his blog won't show what a friendly and knowledgeable guy he is. I highly recommend Kelly to anyone looking for a CTO or a seminar on agile/scrum practices - you won't be disappointed!”


“Kelly was a great colleague to work with - highly competent, trustworthy and generally a nice bloke.”


“Kelly was engaged as a Program Director on a complex business and technology transformation program for Suncorp Commercial Insurance. Kelly drew on his key capabilities and depth of experience to bring together disparate parties in a harmonised way, ensuring the initiate and concept phases of the program were understood and well formulated. Excellent outcome in a very short time frame. ”


“I worked with Kelly on many projects at IPC and I was always impressed with his approach to all of them, always ensuring the most commercially viable route was taken. He is great at managing relationships and it was always a pleasure working with him.”


“I worked with Kelly whilst at Thoughtworks and found him to be a most inspiring individual, his common-sense approach coupled with a deep understanding of Agile and business makes him an invaluable asset to any organisation. I can't recommend Kelly enough.”


“Kelly was a brilliant CTO and a great support to me in the time we worked together. I owe Kelly a great deal in terms of direction and how to get things done under sometimes difficult circumstances. Thanks Kelly.”