For Quick Decisions, Depend on Deadlines

This content is syndicated from LeanAgileTraining by Joe Little. To view the original post in full, click here.

In Saturday’s (8/2/2013) Wall Street Journal, Dan Ariely suggests that to reach a decision, and often just to make progress, you need deadlines.  Deadlines ‘force’ people to take action.

And this is what we have known with Scrum for years.  So, we have timeboxes all over the place (and recommend using them more than just where prescribed by the bare framework of Scrum).

Based on research, Ariely says:

Because deadlines allow us to clarify our thoughts and create an action plan. They are good at getting people to perform a particular act, like submitting a grant proposal.

We feel indecisive, uncertain, unsure, and so we ‘lose the name of action’ as Shakespeare said.  And the deadlines force us to act.  The timeboxes force us to act.

The first timebox in Scrum is the Sprint timebox. Say, 2 weeks, in which we must have working (tested) product.  It helps us get things done. Not just decided, but done.

Leave a Reply

What is 4 + 3 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
Please do this simple sum so I know you are human:)

There are 101 ways to approach anything.
To find the best way, sometimes you need expert help

What People Say

“Kelly is an Agile heavy-weight. He came in to assess my multi-million $ Agile development program which wasn’t delivering the right throughput. He interviewed most of the team and made some key recommendations that, when implemented, showed immediate results. I couldn’t ask for more than that except he’s a really nice guy as well.”



To explore how we can help you, please get in touch